🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them online.

Potential Impetus for AI Development

Observers noted the apparent data breach could boost AI companies looking for data to develop their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Stated Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a huge online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between artists, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.